Magnetic Luminous Eye Color Bright Eyes dupes and alternatives Nudestix
4.4 (717)·Taupe · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (14%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than taupe· Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than taupe · Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$20 less (69%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Mauve rather than taupe· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than taupe · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: medium mauve w/ pink micro glitter
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
IT Cosmetics Superhero No-Tug Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Transformative Taupe, against Nudestix Magnetic Luminous Eye Color in Bright Eyes. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBright EyesClosest shade matchTransformative TaupeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%87#a47f7c#a78681Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94MediumLightCloseDepth difference 3.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared35
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall70
Longevity50%7511-hour wear16-hour wearSome difference16-hour wear claimed against 11-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 70/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Half Magic Sparklestik Eye Crayon in FAUXBOT, against Nudestix Magnetic Luminous Eye Color in Bright Eyes. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBright EyesClosest overall alternativeFAUXBOTHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%81#a47f7c#a18178Close colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall68
Longevity50%9511-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 11-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 88/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $5 more
