Magnetic Luminous Eye Color Rustique dupes and alternatives Nudestix
4.4 (717)·Bronze · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: white chocolate, rosy velvet, & brownie bite
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Mauve rather than bronze· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than bronze · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Copper rather than bronze· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than bronze · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Terracotta rather than bronze· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than bronze · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$15.01 less (52%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Same warm undertone
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Copper rather than bronze· Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Copper rather than bronze · Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Terracotta rather than bronze· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than bronze · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Copper rather than bronze· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than bronze · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Half Magic Sparklestik Eye Crayon in PRINCESS TEDDY, against Nudestix Magnetic Luminous Eye Color in Rustique. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRustiqueClosest shade matchPRINCESS TEDDYHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%79#a76a5e#9c6958Close colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall68
Longevity50%9511-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 11-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 83/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in BRANDY FLAME, against Nudestix Magnetic Luminous Eye Color in Rustique. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRustiqueClosest overall alternativeBRANDY FLAMEHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour60%80#a76a5e#a47368Close colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.9 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 82/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.