MatteTrance Lipstick Elson 2 dupes and alternatives Pat McGrath Labs
4.0 (932)·Red · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (36%)4.8 (1,631)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
16
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: yellow red with multidimensional pearl
MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Silky Matte Lipstick in Lady Danger, against Pat McGrath Labs MatteTrance Lipstick in Elson 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeElson 2Closest matchLady DangerHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall95
Colour60%92#cc2b25#d62427Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall100
Finish55%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Opacity45%100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Longevity60%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 86/100Shade match 95/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.