MatteTrance Lipstick Omi 107 dupes and alternatives Pat McGrath Labs
4.0 (932)·Rose · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Looks identical · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Sheer tint rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Sheer tint · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Sheer tint rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Urban Decay Vice Lip Bond Glossy Longwear Liquid Lipstick in PDA, against Pat McGrath Labs MatteTrance Lipstick in Omi 107. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeOmi 107Closest shade matchPDAHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall92
Colour60%95#bb3939#b9363bLooks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Finish55%34MatteGlossyDifferentGlossy finish rather than matte
Opacity45%100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity60%40Not listed16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 77/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Dior Rouge Dior On Stage Matte Lipstick in 422 Rosewood Glam, against Pat McGrath Labs MatteTrance Lipstick in Omi 107. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeOmi 107Closest overall alternative422 Rosewood GlamHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall87
Colour60%79#bb3939#ba4148Close colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall100
Finish55%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Opacity45%100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity60%40Not listed24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 83/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.