Skin Fetish Divine Blush Electric Bloom dupes and alternatives Pat McGrath Labs
4.7 (763)·Coral · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Red rather than coral· 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than coral · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
$36Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (8%)4.3 (1,914)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Red rather than coral
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Red rather than coral · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims waterproof· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims hydration
Differences: Red rather than coral· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than coral · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than coral· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than coral · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Apricot rather than coral· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Apricot rather than coral · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Red rather than coral· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Red rather than coral · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Fenty Beauty Shake N' Play Buildable Liquid Blush in Fiya Papaya, against Pat McGrath Labs Skin Fetish Divine Blush in Electric Bloom. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeElectric BloomClosest matchFiya PapayaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour55%85#f52b43#fe374eVery close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%91MediumMediumSameDepth difference 4.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100CoralCoralSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall69
Finish50%78MatteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than matte
Overall match 78/100Shade match 91/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.