Skin Fetish Divine Blush Paradise Venus dupes and alternatives Pat McGrath Labs
4.7 (763)·Terracotta · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Red rather than terracotta· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than terracotta · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Pink rather than terracotta· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than terracotta · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Peach rather than terracotta· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Peach rather than terracotta · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Peach rather than terracotta· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Looks identical · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than terracotta · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than terracotta· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than terracotta · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
90
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
NARS Talc-Free Powder Blush in Obsession - 923, against Pat McGrath Labs Skin Fetish Divine Blush in Paradise Venus. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeParadise VenusClosest matchObsession - 923How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour55%95#eb6b5c#e76658Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.3 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 82/100Shade match 86/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$20 less (51%)
Sephora
