Fresh Touch 24H Radiant Foundation 10W dupes and alternatives Rabanne
4.2 (481)·Light · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
87
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: fair medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: very light with golden olive undertones
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
37
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: light skin with warm olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: light with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (67%)3.5 (10)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
57
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: fair or light skin tones with a neutral undertone
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: light with warm, subtle olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Differences: Slightly lighter· Luminous rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly lighter · Luminous rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
$39Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (7%)4.3 (1,754)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
57
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
36
Wear & performance
52
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: fair medium with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
36
Wear & performance
52
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
The closest shade to Rabanne Fresh Touch 24H Radiant Foundation 10W (Light · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
KimChi Chic Beauty A Really Good Foundation in 105L, against Rabanne Fresh Touch 24H Radiant Foundation in 10W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade10WClosest shade match105LHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%96#ddbe99#debd94Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference: 0.3
Retailer descriptionFairLightSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 80/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Studio Radiance Serum Powered Foundation in NC11, against Rabanne Fresh Touch 24H Radiant Foundation in 10W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade10WClosest overall alternativeNC11How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#ddbe99#d9bb94Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference: 1.7
Retailer descriptionFairFairBoth described as fairThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 90/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $3 more
Target
