Fresh Touch 24H Radiant Foundation 20W dupes and alternatives Rabanne
4.2 (481)·Light medium · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: for light to medium skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/oily skin
Retailer shade note: light with neutral olive tones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same medium coverage· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: light with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
The closest shade to Rabanne Fresh Touch 24H Radiant Foundation 20W (Light medium · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
PÜR 4-in-1 Pressed Mineral Makeup SPF 15 in Linen MN3, against Rabanne Fresh Touch 24H Radiant Foundation in 20W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade20WClosest shade matchLinen MN3How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#d9b395#dab698Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Overall match 83/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Makeup By Mario SurrealSkin Natural Finish Foundation in 8 N, against Rabanne Fresh Touch 24H Radiant Foundation in 20W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade20WClosest overall alternative8 NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%99#d9b395#d8b396Looks identicalColour difference 0.4 (0 is identical)
Overall match 86/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $18 more
