All of the Above Weightless Eyeshadow Stick Contentment dupes and alternatives Rare Beauty
4.4 (733)·Taupe · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than dewy (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than dewy (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Shimmer rather than dewy (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Shimmer rather than dewy (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Shimmer rather than dewy (finish)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Shimmer rather than dewy (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Metallic rather than dewy (finish)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Metallic rather than dewy (finish) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (59%)4.2 (2,863)
Shimmer · Buildable
Differences: Deeper· Shimmer rather than dewy (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Shimmer rather than dewy (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than dewy (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than dewy (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than dewy (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than dewy (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than dewy (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than dewy (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than dewy (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix Stix - Multi-Use Pearl Pigment Stick for Eye, Cheek & Lip in Duo #6 Celeste & Nova, against Rare Beauty All of the Above Weightless Eyeshadow Stick in Contentment. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeContentmentClosest shade matchDuo #6 Celeste & NovaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%89#b8978e#c09f97Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90MediumLightCloseDepth difference 4.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared44
Finish65%31DewyDuochromeDifferentDuochrome finish rather than dewy
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall82
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedDry, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 74/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Rare Beauty Soft Pinch Liquid Contour in Gentle, against Rare Beauty All of the Above Weightless Eyeshadow Stick in Contentment. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeContentmentClosest overall alternativeGentleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%85#b8978e#b59485Very close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumLightCloseDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared59
Finish65%63DewyNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than dewy
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%45StickLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall88
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $12 more
