All of the Above Weightless Eyeshadow Stick Growth dupes and alternatives Rare Beauty
4.4 (733)·Copper · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than dewy (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than dewy (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than dewy (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than dewy (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than copper· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than copper · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: rich caramel bronze / tan marble glow
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than copper· Shimmer rather than dewy (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than copper · Shimmer rather than dewy (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than copper· Shimmer rather than dewy (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than copper · Shimmer rather than dewy (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 15-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than copper· Shimmer rather than dewy (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than copper · Shimmer rather than dewy (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Metallic rather than dewy (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
51
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than dewy (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
47
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than copper· Shimmer rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than copper · Shimmer rather than dewy (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than copper· Metallic rather than dewy (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than copper · Metallic rather than dewy (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than copper· Metallic rather than dewy (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
51
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than copper · Metallic rather than dewy (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than copper· Metallic rather than dewy (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than copper · Metallic rather than dewy (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: a shimmering warm taupe / a shimmering blackened green
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Brown rather than copper· Shimmer rather than dewy (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than copper · Shimmer rather than dewy (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than copper· Metallic rather than dewy (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than copper · Metallic rather than dewy (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Bronze rather than copper· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
47
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than copper · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than copper· Metallic rather than dewy (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than copper · Metallic rather than dewy (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (68%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Bronze rather than copper· Glitter rather than dewy (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
37
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than copper · Glitter rather than dewy (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: warm bronze with gold pinpoints
Patrick Ta Major Dimension Eye Illusion Eyeshadow Duo in Talk To My Team, against Rare Beauty All of the Above Weightless Eyeshadow Stick in Growth. Matched on the deeper eyeshadow pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGrowthClosest shade matchTalk To My TeamHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%86#b4876d#bb8367Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100CopperCopperSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared63
Finish65%70DewyShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than dewy
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPaletteDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 75/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Bronze Baddie, against Rare Beauty All of the Above Weightless Eyeshadow Stick in Growth. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGrowthClosest overall alternativeBronze BaddieHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%89#b4876d#b7846dVery close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 82/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $11 more
