Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip gloss overall: shade match 50%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 10%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same shine: shimmer· Both claim non-sticky
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than rose· Shimmer rather than pearl (shimmer)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than rose · Shimmer rather than pearl (shimmer) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same shine: shimmer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than rose· Shimmer rather than pearl (shimmer)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 32% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than rose · Shimmer rather than pearl (shimmer) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim non-sticky
Matches: Same shine: shimmer· Both claim non-sticky· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than rose · Shimmer rather than pearl (shimmer) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same shine: shimmer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than rose· Sparkle rather than pearl (shimmer)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than rose · Sparkle rather than pearl (shimmer) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim non-sticky
Retailer shade note: sheer magenta with silver sparkle
Kulfi Lassi Lips Staining Long-Lasting Moisturizing Lip Oil in Date, against Rare Beauty Positive Light Luminizing Lip Gloss in Glimmer. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGlimmerClosest matchDateHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall92
Colour55%96#a64f55#a55255Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60WarmNeutralSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared78
Shine40%78ShimmerHigh shineCloseMore shine
Transparency35%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a transparency
Shimmer25%—not comparablePearlNot listedNot listed for eitherShimmer not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity100%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability10% of overall70
Non-sticky50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a non-sticky feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 78/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.