Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: cream
Differences: Terracotta rather than coral· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than coral · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Peach rather than coral· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than coral · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Terracotta rather than coral· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than coral · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: cream
Differences: Brown / nude rather than coral· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than coral · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Peach rather than coral· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Peach rather than coral · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Brown / nude rather than coral· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than coral · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural
Differences: Peach rather than coral· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than coral · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: Rich Mid-Tone Rose Petal Pink Trio
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Brown / nude rather than coral· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than coral · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: soft rose beige (dream blur matte)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown / nude rather than coral· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than coral · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Lighter· Apricot rather than coral· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Apricot rather than coral · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: cream· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than coral· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than coral · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Peach rather than coral· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than coral · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Pink rather than coral· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Pink rather than coral · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Pink rather than coral· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than coral · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than coral· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than coral · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than coral· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
57
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than coral · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
bareMinerals Talc-Free Loose Mineral Blush in Vintage Peach, against Rare Beauty Stay Vulnerable Melting Cream Blush in Nearly Apricot. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNearly ApricotClosest shade matchVintage PeachHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour55%88#d68a7f#da918aVery close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94MediumLightCloseDepth difference 3.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100CoralCoralSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall50
Finish50%67NaturalDewySome differenceDewy finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%30SheerOpaqueDifferentOpaque rather than sheer
Format25%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 74/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Fenty Beauty Cheeks Out Freestyle Cream Blush in Petal Poppin, against Rare Beauty Stay Vulnerable Melting Cream Blush in Nearly Apricot. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNearly ApricotClosest overall alternativePetal PoppinHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour55%93#d68a7f#dc9083Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumLightCloseDepth difference 3.1 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 84/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $12 more
Sephora
