Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same format: cream· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: cream· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: natural· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than mauve· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than mauve · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
57
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: cream· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Pink rather than mauve· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
57
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: A powdery pink mauve with golden shimmer
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: sheer· Same format: cream· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than natural (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Haus Labs Color Fuse Longwear Hydrating Glassy Lip + Cheek Blush Balm Stick in Glassy Hibiscus, against Rare Beauty Stay Vulnerable Melting Cream Blush in Nearly Mauve. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNearly MauveClosest shade matchGlassy HibiscusHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour55%89#d18d93#c58a90Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 3.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall75
Finish50%67NaturalDewySome differenceDewy finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format25%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listed8-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 80/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Patrick Ta Major Headlines Double-Take Crème & Powder Blush Duo in Out Of Office, against Rare Beauty Stay Vulnerable Melting Cream Blush in Nearly Mauve. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNearly MauveClosest overall alternativeOut Of OfficeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour55%87#d18d93#dd9295Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93MediumLightCloseDepth difference 3.7 on the 0–100 scale
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish50%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 80/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $6 more
Ulta Beauty
