Skin Base Hydrating Gel Skin Tint 210W dupes and alternatives Refy
4.3 (222)·Tan · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium - deep with warm deep golden undertones
$29Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (28%)4.6 (558)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
56
Very close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
30
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (40%)3.9 (396)
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium skin with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
46
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
75
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$24 less (60%)4.5 (15,723)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: golden caramel with warm undertone
The closest shade to Refy Skin Base Hydrating Gel Skin Tint 210W (Tan · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Hydrating CC Cream SPF 30 in Tan 400 W, against Refy Skin Base Hydrating Gel Skin Tint in 210W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade210WClosest shade matchTan 400 WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#bb7445#bb7544Looks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.3
Retailer descriptionMedium tanTanSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 79/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NARS Light Reflecting Foundation in Caracas, against Refy Skin Base Hydrating Gel Skin Tint in 210W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade210WClosest overall alternativeCaracasHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#bb7445#be7641Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98TanTanSameDepth difference: 1.2
Retailer descriptionMedium tanMedium tanBoth described as medium tanThe retailers describe the same depth
Coverage30%80LightMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, combination, sensitiveNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/combination skin
Overall match 89/100Shade match 96/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.