Skin Base Hydrating Gel Skin Tint 260N dupes and alternatives Refy
4.3 (222)·Very deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: cool undertone for the richest of deep complexions
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deepest with cool rose undertones
The closest shade to Refy Skin Base Hydrating Gel Skin Tint 260N (Very deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
KimChi Chic Beauty A Really Good Foundation in 140D, against Refy Skin Base Hydrating Gel Skin Tint in 260N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade260NClosest shade match140DHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#5d3b2b#5d3c2bLooks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Overall match 83/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Urban Decay Hydromaniac Hydrating Dewy Foundation in 90, against Refy Skin Base Hydrating Gel Skin Tint in 260N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade260NClosest overall alternative90How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#5d3b2b#5b3826Looks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%80LightMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared80
Longevity30%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall30
Skin type100%30Normal, combination, sensitiveNormal, dryBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 88/100Shade match 97/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $15 more
