Pocket Bronze Long-Wearing Cream Bronzer pebble dupes and alternatives rhode
4.2 (505)·Rose · Neutral · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Golden rather than rose· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Golden rather than rose · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Use as bronzer: possible
Retailer shade note: Light tan with cool undertones
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than rose· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than rose · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than rose · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: cream· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than rose · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim hydration
Use as bronzer: possible
Retailer shade note: light brown with cool undertones
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: contour for very light to light skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Same skin types: normal, dry, combination
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than rose· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Very close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than rose · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: a warm bronze shade fused with Radiant Light to mimic a summer glow. (Ideal for medium/deep complexions)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Bronze rather than rose· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
50
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Slight colour difference · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Bronze rather than rose · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light bronze with neutral undertones
Matches: Same format: cream· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Golden rather than rose · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim hydration
Use as bronzer: possible
Retailer shade note: soft tan with cool undertones
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than rose · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same format: cream· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Deeper· Bronze rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Bronze rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: fair to light with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than rose· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than rose · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: medium neutral bronze / medium marble glow
RMS Beauty ReDimension Hydra Bronzer in Beachwalk Betty, against rhode Pocket Bronze Long-Wearing Cream Bronzer in pebble. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadepebbleClosest shade matchBeachwalk BettyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour55%88#d89d80#d7a17fVery close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth25%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 77/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
bareMinerals GEN NUDE BLONZER Blush + Bronzer in Kiss of Spice, against rhode Pocket Bronze Long-Wearing Cream Bronzer in pebble. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadepebbleClosest overall alternativeKiss of SpiceHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall77
Colour55%76#d89d80#d9a682Close colourColour difference 4.2 (0 is identical)
Depth25%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Overall match 86/100Shade match 77/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $11 more
