Pocket Bronze Long-Wearing Cream Bronzer sip dupes and alternatives rhode
4.2 (505)·Golden · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream
Differences: 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort· Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: cream· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Terracotta rather than golden· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Terracotta rather than golden · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: cream· Both claim comfort
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: fair to light with neutral-warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Laura Mercier Bronze Color Infusion Talc-Free Matte & Luminous Duo in 30 Cannes, against rhode Pocket Bronze Long-Wearing Cream Bronzer in sip. Matched on the lighter bronzer pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadesipClosest shade match30 CannesHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%95#c68b74#c3876eLooks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth25%97LightLightSameDepth difference 2.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared50
Finish50%—not comparableNot listedNaturalNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Pigmentation25%65BuildableSheerSome differenceSheer rather than buildable
Format25%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance15% of overall55
Longevity50%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall58
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 77/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Morphe Cheek Thrills Bronze & Tone Duo in Maui Surf, against rhode Pocket Bronze Long-Wearing Cream Bronzer in sip. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadesipClosest overall alternativeMaui SurfHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour55%72#c68b74#c88a65Close colourColour difference 4.7 (0 is identical)
Depth25%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Finish50%—not comparableNot listedMatteNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $27 more
Walmart
