Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: soft peach (swish and pop glow)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Apricot rather than peach· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Apricot rather than peach · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy
Differences: Pink rather than peach· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than peach · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Deeper· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Rich Mid-Tone Rose Petal Pink Trio
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
44
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Very close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Deeper· Brown / nude rather than peach· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown / nude rather than peach · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Pink rather than peach· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than peach · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than peach· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than peach · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: A subdued coral blush fused with Dim Light to add warmth
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Balm rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Balm rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Coral rather than peach· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than peach · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: shimmering deep coral with gold pearl
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Coral rather than peach· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than peach · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Danessa Myricks Beauty Yummy Skin Blurring Balm Powder Flushed - Matte Color for Cheek & Lip in Bellini, against RMS Beauty ReDimension Hydra Powder Blush in Bohemian Girl. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBohemian GirlClosest shade matchBelliniHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour55%99#f79181#f6907fLooks identicalColour difference 0.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PeachPeachSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall56
Finish50%45DewyMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than dewy
Overall match 87/100Shade match 99/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Kosas Blush is Life Baked Talc-Free Dimensional + Brightening Blush in Wavelength, against RMS Beauty ReDimension Hydra Powder Blush in Bohemian Girl. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBohemian GirlClosest overall alternativeWavelengthHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour55%86#f79181#fb8a73Very close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PeachPeachSameSame colour family
Overall match 95/100Shade match 92/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.