Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Pink rather than plum· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Looks identical · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than plum · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Mauve rather than plum· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Mauve rather than plum · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Mauve rather than plum· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than plum · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Berry rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Berry rather than plum · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown / nude rather than plum· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown / nude rather than plum · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Mauve rather than plum· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
49
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than plum · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Rose rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Rose rather than plum · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Berry rather than plum· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than plum · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than plum· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than plum · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Rose rather than plum· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than plum · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than plum· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than plum · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Coral rather than plum· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Coral rather than plum · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: medium peachy coral with slight shimmer
Matches: Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Berry rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Berry rather than plum · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Coral rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Coral rather than plum · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Berry rather than plum· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
34
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than plum · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than plum · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Mauve rather than plum· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Mauve rather than plum · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Berry rather than plum· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
49
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than plum · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Dior Rosy Glow Blush Stick in 109 Goji, against RMS Beauty ReDimension Hydra Powder Blush in Hanky Panky. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHanky PankyClosest match109 GojiHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour55%92#ad6a70#b36c6fVery close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 88/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.