About That Shine Sheer Shine Lipstick 02 Soft Twinkle dupes and alternatives Sephora Collection
4.4 (552)·Rose · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same opacity: sheer
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than rose· Satin rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than rose · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same opacity: sheer
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: sheer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Shimmer rather than sheer tint (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
46
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Shimmer rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$12Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (25%)4.2 (810)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than rose· Shimmer rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
46
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than rose · Shimmer rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: neutral pink with slight shimmer
Matches: Same opacity: sheer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than rose· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than rose · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: sheer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than rose · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than rose· Satin rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than rose · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
NARS Afterglow Lipstick in Devotion 208, against Sephora Collection About That Shine Sheer Shine Lipstick in 02 Soft Twinkle. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade02 Soft TwinkleClosest matchDevotion 208How they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall95
Colour60%93#c0797e#c37c85Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared65
Finish55%—not comparableSheer tintNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Longevity60%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 90/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.