About That Shine Sheer Shine Lipstick 15 Galactic Plum dupes and alternatives Sephora Collection
4.4 (552)·Plum · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Satin rather than sheer tint (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Mauve rather than plum· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than plum · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than plum· Satin rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than plum · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than plum· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than plum · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than plum· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than plum · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Shimmer rather than sheer tint (finish)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Shimmer rather than sheer tint (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than plum· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than plum · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: sheer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than plum· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than plum · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than plum· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish & visual result
63
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Glossy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than plum · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$3.01 less (19%)4.4 (49,497)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Mauve rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
45
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Mauve rather than plum · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than plum · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Satin rather than sheer tint (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than plum· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than plum · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Maybelline SuperStay Matte Ink Liquid Lipstick in 95 Visionary, against Sephora Collection About That Shine Sheer Shine Lipstick in 15 Galactic Plum. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade15 Galactic PlumClosest match95 VisionaryHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall80
Colour60%82#7d4d63#825260Close colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 2.6 on the 0–100 scale
Finish55%45Sheer tintMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than sheer tint
Opacity45%30SheerOpaqueDifferentOpaque rather than sheer
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared70
Longevity60%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 68/100Shade match 80/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Amazon
Ulta BeautyCosts $20 more
Sephora
CVS
