Sephora Colorful Blush 05 Sweet On You dupes and alternatives Sephora Collection
4.2 (677)·Rose · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims comfort
Differences: Coral rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Claims hydration
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims comfort
Differences: Coral rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: A vibrant pink with golden shimmer
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims comfort
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Coral rather than rose· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than rose · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims comfort
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
45
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
RMS Beauty ReDimension Hydra Powder Blush in French Rose, against Sephora Collection Sephora Colorful Blush in 05 Sweet On You. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade05 Sweet On YouClosest matchFrench RoseHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour55%92#f27473#ef7d7aVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.1 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 77/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $14 more
