Sephora Colorful Blush 29 Fascinated dupes and alternatives Sephora Collection
4.2 (677)·Coral · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims comfort
Differences: Apricot rather than coral· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
49
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Apricot rather than coral · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims hydration
Differences: Peach rather than coral· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
45
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than coral · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Claims comfort
Differences: Deeper· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Peach rather than coral
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Peach rather than coral · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format)
Differences: Peach rather than coral· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than coral · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Natasha Denona Hy-Blush Cloudy Cream Cheek Duo in Simply Shy, against Sephora Collection Sephora Colorful Blush in 29 Fascinated. Matched on the deeper blush pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade29 FascinatedClosest shade matchSimply ShyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour55%88#f67168#f27974Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumLightCloseDepth difference 1.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100CoralCoralSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall65
Finish50%80ShimmerDewyCloseDewy finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 76/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Hourglass Ambient Lighting Blush in Diffused Heat, against Sephora Collection Sephora Colorful Blush in 29 Fascinated. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade29 FascinatedClosest overall alternativeDiffused HeatHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour55%73#f67168#f4817eClose colourColour difference 4.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90MediumLightCloseDepth difference 4.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100CoralCoralSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared87
Finish50%80ShimmerDewyCloseDewy finish rather than shimmer
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 77/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $6 more
