Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 60H Mahogany dupes and alternatives Tarte
4.4 (2,174)·Rich deep · Warm · peach undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$34 less (81%)4.5 (40,486)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (40%)4.2 (812)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: rich deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: deep to rich - neutral, slightly olive
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 27% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral olive undertones
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral rich-brown undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for deeper skin with golden neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: deepest with golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 27% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Light rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Light rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
The closest shade to Tarte Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 60H Mahogany (Rich deep · Warm · peach undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Ulta Beauty Collection Complexion Crush Foundation in Deep Warm, against Tarte Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 in 60H Mahogany. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade60H MahoganyClosest shade matchDeep WarmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#582915#56240dVery close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Overall match 78/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Estée Lauder Futurist Skin Tint Serum Foundation SPF 20 in 7W2 Rich Spice, against Tarte Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 in 60H Mahogany. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade60H MahoganyClosest overall alternative7W2 Rich SpiceHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#582915#582616Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Overall match 88/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $7 more
