Perfect Canvas Foundation 3.5N/W Birch dupes and alternatives Temptu
Medium light · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
$20Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (41%)4.5 (18)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: golden neutral with warm depth
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: fair Medium with warm undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (29%)4.3 (6,617)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: for light skin w/ neutral warm undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: beige with neutral undertone for light skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$15.01 less (44%)4.4 (40,035)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Claims colour stability
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims colour stability
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims colour stability
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
The closest shade to Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation 3.5N/W Birch (Medium light · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Rabanne Fresh Touch 24H Radiant Foundation in 30N, against Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation in 3.5N/W Birch. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade3.5N/W BirchClosest shade match30NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#d4a77e#d1a67eLooks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Finish35%34Natural matteRadiantDifferentRadiant finish rather than natural matte
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 84/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Fluid Flex Natural Matte Longwear Foundation in 216N, against Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation in 3.5N/W Birch. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade3.5N/W BirchClosest overall alternative216NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%96#d4a77e#d5a57dLooks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared91
Finish35%78Natural matteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than natural matte
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall79
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims colour stability (no oxidation); your product does not list it
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, combination, oilySkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 91/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $14 more
Target
