Perfect Canvas Foundation 9N Rosewood dupes and alternatives Temptu
Deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$20Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (41%)3.7 (146)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: tan skin with neutral undertones
$6.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$27.01 less (79%)3.8 (142)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: tan deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for deeper skin with neutral undertones
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$22.01 less (65%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
$20Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (41%)3.7 (146)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: deeper brown w/ red undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 29% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: Deep tan with red-golden undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (29%)4.3 (49)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel· Adds SPF 30
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: medium-deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 27% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: tan deep with warm undertones
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (53%)4.2 (561)
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: tan to deep skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Claims not settling into lines· Claims colour stability
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 27% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: level-two tan with a cool undertone
$17.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$16.01 less (47%)4.2 (5,328)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Radiant rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: tan skin with warm olive undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: tan skin with warm olive undertones
Matches: Claims not settling into lines· Claims colour stability· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
$22Ulta Beauty(product price)$12 less (35%)3.5 (42)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same buildable coverage
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$6.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$27.01 less (79%)3.8 (142)
Matte · Medium coverage
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: tan deep with warm undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deeper skin with neutral undertones
The closest shade to Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation 9N Rosewood (Deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Anastasia Beverly Hills Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation in 6N, against Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation in 9N Rosewood. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade9N RosewoodClosest shade match6NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#8c5948#8d5e4eVery close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 2.2
Retailer descriptionTanTanBoth described as tanThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish35%78Natural matteMatteCloseMatte finish rather than natural matte
Coverage30%80BuildableFullCloseFull coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared61
Longevity30%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, combination, oilySkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ColourPop Pretty Fresh Hyaluronic Hydrating Foundation in Deep Dark 205N, against Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation in 9N Rosewood. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade9N RosewoodClosest overall alternativeDeep Dark 205NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#8c5948#8f5f4fVery close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 2.9
Retailer descriptionTanNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared91
Finish35%78Natural matteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than natural matte
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared54
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.