Architecture Soft Matte Contour Duo Intensity 1.0 dupes and alternatives Tom Ford
4.5 (1,163)·Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar contour overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Retailer shade note: neutral/olive undertone, natural finish for tan skin tones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal (skin types)
Retailer shade note: contour, cool neutral undertone for light medium skin tones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Matches: Same pigmentation: sheer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Retailer shade note: medium bronze with warm undertones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal (skin types)
Retailer shade note: light-medium with neutral undertones
$36Ulta Beauty(product price)$49 less (58%)4.2 (455)
Matches: Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
52
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Dry, Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than bronze· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than bronze · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Dry, Normal, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Claims transfer resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Retailer shade note: warm golden undertone, natural finish for medium skin tones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Charlotte Tilbury Hollywood Contour Wand in Medium/Dark, against Tom Ford Architecture Soft Matte Contour Duo in Intensity 1.0. Compared using the contour pan of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeIntensity 1.0Closest matchMedium/DarkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour50%94#a66c3b#ac6e39Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth25%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared89
Finish60%89NaturalSatinCloseSatin finish rather than natural
Pigmentation20%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format20%—not comparableNot listedLiquidNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormalNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.