Architecture Soft Matte Contour Duo Intensity 2.0 dupes and alternatives Tom Ford
4.5 (1,163)·Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar contour overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$77 less (91%)4.6 (16,298)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal (skin types)
Use as contour: possible
Retailer shade note: medium-deep with warm undertones
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$77 less (91%)4.6 (16,298)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$77 less (91%)4.6 (16,298)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
87
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal (skin types)
Retailer shade note: contour for medium deep skin tones, cool undertone
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
52
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Dry, Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal (skin types)
Retailer shade note: light-medium to medium-tan skin tones
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
57
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal (skin types)
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
87
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal (skin types)
Retailer shade note: contour, cool undertone for medium skin tones
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
Clinique Chubby Stick Sculpting Contour Stick in Curvy Contour, against Tom Ford Architecture Soft Matte Contour Duo in Intensity 2.0. Compared using the contour pan of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeIntensity 2.0Closest matchCurvy ContourHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour50%92#7e4c35#7f492dVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth25%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared91
Finish60%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Pigmentation20%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format20%—not comparableNot listedStickNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormalNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.