Lip Injection Extreme Lip Shaper Plumping Lip Liner Voted Most Popular dupes and alternatives Too Faced
4.2 (1,787)·Pink · Neutral · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip liner overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 10%, wear and performance 25%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Red rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
89
Comfort & suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Red rather than pink · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Mauve rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
89
Comfort & suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Mauve rather than pink · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
89
Comfort & suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than pink · 9-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Red rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Red rather than pink · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Red rather than pink· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
50
Very close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Red rather than pink · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
$9.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$15.50 less (62%)4.2 (1,893)
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Mauve rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Red rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
89
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Red rather than pink · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
e.l.f. Cosmetics Cream Glide Lip Liner in Fuchsia Forward, against Too Faced Lip Injection Extreme Lip Shaper Plumping Lip Liner in Voted Most Popular. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeVoted Most PopularClosest shade matchFuchsia ForwardHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall82
Colour60%78#e32b5d#ec2852Close colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth20%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%60NeutralCoolSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family10%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result10% of overall · none of 1 comparable50
Finish100%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Wear & performance25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared40
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Smudge and transfer30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims smudge or transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Format and precision20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a format
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Comfort50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 67/100Shade match 82/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Urban Decay Lip Toy Staining Brush Lip Liner in Pose, against Too Faced Lip Injection Extreme Lip Shaper Plumping Lip Liner in Voted Most Popular. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeVoted Most PopularClosest overall alternativePoseHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall81
Colour60%76#e32b5d#cf4459Close colourColour difference 4.2 (0 is identical)
Depth20%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Finish & visual result10% of overall · none of 1 comparable50
Finish100%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Wear & performance25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared85
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Smudge and transfer30%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim smudge or transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Format and precision20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a format
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Comfort50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 77/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.