Swipe Serum Non-Acnegenic Foundation 14.5R Palm Springs dupes and alternatives Tower 28 Beauty
4.0 (441)·Tan · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
$18.49Ulta Beauty(product price)$17.51 less (49%)4.3 (1,381)
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Olive rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
68
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Olive rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim
Retailer shade note: deep tan with neutral olive undertone
The closest shade to Tower 28 Beauty Swipe Serum Non-Acnegenic Foundation 14.5R Palm Springs (Tan · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Benefit Cosmetics The POREfessional Blurring & Smoothing Foundation in 31N Exceptional, against Tower 28 Beauty Swipe Serum Non-Acnegenic Foundation in 14.5R Palm Springs. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade14.5R Palm SpringsClosest shade match31N ExceptionalHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%90#a57956#a67555Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98TanTanSameDepth difference: 1.3
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared70
Finish35%56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared73
Longevity30%6016-hour wear24-hour wearSome difference24-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0SensitiveNormal, combination, oilyMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 75/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Yepoda The Dewy Day in 7N, against Tower 28 Beauty Swipe Serum Non-Acnegenic Foundation in 14.5R Palm Springs. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade14.5R Palm SpringsClosest overall alternative7NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%89#a57956#ad7850Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.9
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared68
Finish35%56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%100MediumBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared87
Longevity30%8016-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall73
Skin type100%73SensitiveNormal, dry, sensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 80/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $6 more
Target
Walmart
