Swipe Serum Non-Acnegenic Foundation 14.5R Palm Springs dupes and alternatives Tower 28 Beauty
4.0 (441)·Tan · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
$20Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (44%)4.5 (18)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: true neutral brown; ideal for deep complexions or bronzing medium tones
$22Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (39%)3.5 (42)
Matches: Very close colour
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
$18.49Ulta Beauty(product price)$17.51 less (49%)4.3 (1,381)
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Olive rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
68
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Olive rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim
Retailer shade note: deep tan with neutral olive undertone
The closest shade to Tower 28 Beauty Swipe Serum Non-Acnegenic Foundation 14.5R Palm Springs (Tan · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
L'Oréal Paris True Match Nude Hyaluronic Tinted Serum in Blue, against Tower 28 Beauty Swipe Serum Non-Acnegenic Foundation in 14.5R Palm Springs. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade14.5R Palm SpringsClosest shade matchBlueHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#a57956#a4774fVery close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98TanTanSameDepth difference: 1.0
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared91
Finish35%100RadiantRadiantSameSame radiant finish
Coverage30%80MediumLightCloseLight coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared40
Longevity30%4016-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall68
Skin type100%68SensitiveCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 85/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Chanel LES BEIGES Healthy Glow Foundation Hydration and Longwear in BR112, against Tower 28 Beauty Swipe Serum Non-Acnegenic Foundation in 14.5R Palm Springs. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade14.5R Palm SpringsClosest overall alternativeBR112How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%86#a57956#af7955Very close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97TanTanSameDepth difference: 1.7
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared91
Finish35%100RadiantRadiantSameSame radiant finish
Coverage30%80MediumLightCloseLight coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared60
Longevity30%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall68
Skin type100%68SensitiveCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 85/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Walmart
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $13 more
Target
