Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 15-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
47
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 15-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 15-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 15-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 15-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
65
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 15-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 15-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
71
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 15-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Cream rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 15-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
49
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 15-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 15-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: champagne gold that reflects pink
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 15-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims hydration
Differences: Golden rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 15-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Peach rather than rose· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 15-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than rose · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 15-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 15-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
IT Cosmetics Superhero No-Tug Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Resilient Rose, against Urban Decay 24/7 Glaze-On Liquid Eyeshadow in Sugar Twist. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSugar TwistClosest shade matchResilient RoseHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#e4a891#e5ab98Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 91/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 40S tearose, against Urban Decay 24/7 Glaze-On Liquid Eyeshadow in Sugar Twist. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSugar TwistClosest overall alternative40S tearoseHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%88#e4a891#e7b199Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93LightLightSameDepth difference 3.7 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 92/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.