Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than nude· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than nude · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same opacity: sheer· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than nude· Sheer tint rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Sheer tint · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than nude · Sheer tint rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick in $ellout, against Valentino Spike Valentino Buttery Matte Lipstick in Nude Poeme. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNude PoemeClosest shade match$elloutHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall89
Colour60%91#c86c72#d06d70Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%60NeutralCoolSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family13%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall47
Finish55%4MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Opacity45%100SheerSheerSameSame sheer opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared70
Longevity60%7010-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 10-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Comfort50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Overall match 79/100Shade match 89/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Lancôme L'Absolu Rouge Intimatte Buildable Soft Matte Lipstick in 320 Hush Hush, against Valentino Spike Valentino Buttery Matte Lipstick in Nude Poeme. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNude PoemeClosest overall alternative320 Hush HushHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall87
Colour60%88#c86c72#cd737cVery close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%60NeutralCoolSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family13%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall84
Finish55%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Opacity45%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared90
Longevity60%9010-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 10-hour wear
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Overall match 86/100Shade match 87/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$5 less (10%)
