Eye Pods Cream Eye Shadow Les Jours dupes and alternatives Westman Atelier
2.9 (111)·White · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Copper rather than white· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than white · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream
Differences: Brown rather than white· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than white · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than white· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than white · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: metallic bronze shade packed with multidimensional sparkle & a shimmer finish
Matches: Same format: cream· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Grey rather than white· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Grey rather than white · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than white· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than white · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Taupe rather than white· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than white · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$63 less (72%)4.6 (3,381)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than white· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than white · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · Silver rather than white · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than white· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than white · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than white· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than white · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: a shimmering warm chocolate brown / a rich cool brown
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than white· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than white · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than white· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than white · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than white· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than white · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: cream· Claims crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than white· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than white · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: deep champagne with silver flecks
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than white· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than white · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Grey rather than white· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than white · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than white· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than white · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Golden rather than white· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than white · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Red rather than white· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Red rather than white · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than white· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than white · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: modern beige, java jazz, & cocoa dip
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Grey rather than white· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Grey rather than white · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: cream· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Taupe rather than white
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
95
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Taupe rather than white · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than white· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than white · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$79 less (90%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Taupe rather than white· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than white · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than white· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than white · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Clinique All About Shadow Duo Eyeshadow in Ivory Bisque/Bronze Satin New, against Westman Atelier Eye Pods Cream Eye Shadow in Les Jours. Matched on the Bronze Satin New pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLes JoursClosest shade matchIvory Bisque/Bronze Satin NewHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%99#896a57#896a58Looks identicalColour difference 0.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 69/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Matte Eyeshadow in Espresso, against Westman Atelier Eye Pods Cream Eye Shadow in Les Jours. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLes JoursClosest overall alternativeEspressoHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%90#896a57#8b6651Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 70/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.