Eye Pods Cream Eye Shadow Toujours dupes and alternatives Westman Atelier
2.9 (111)·Brown · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$62 less (70%)4.1 (537)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: cream· Claims waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: cream· Claims waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: delicate beiges illuminated by a powder pink holo twist.
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Bronze rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Bronze rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Copper rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
22
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
22
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Clinique High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer in Double Latte, against Westman Atelier Eye Pods Cream Eye Shadow in Toujours. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeToujoursClosest shade matchDouble LatteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%95#a47f6d#9f7c6cLooks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall22
Finish65%5MatteMetallicDifferentMetallic finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 65/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ILIA Eye Stylus Shadow Stick - Long-Lasting Cream Eyeshadow in Noble, against Westman Atelier Eye Pods Cream Eye Shadow in Toujours. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeToujoursClosest overall alternativeNobleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%79#a47f6d#a97a60Close colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared97
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85CreamStickCloseStick rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.