Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
87
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for normal/dry skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: L4 - Light with neutral undertones, and a light peach tone
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: light skin with yellow undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
87
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for normal/dry skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
52
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: L3.75 - Light with warm undertones
The closest shade to Yepoda The Dewy Day 2W (Very fair · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared80
Longevity30%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, sensitiveNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 86/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Glossier Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage in Very Light 3, against Yepoda The Dewy Day in 2W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade2WClosest overall alternativeVery Light 3How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%80#fedfac#f8d2a1Close colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall33
Skin type100%33Normal, dry, sensitiveSensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 86/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $16 more
