Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
87
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
87
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
87
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for normal/dry skin
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
87
Skin suitability
33
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for normal/dry skin
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
33
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Not marketed for sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· Adds SPF 40
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for normal skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep with darker cool red undertones
Matches: Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
87
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for normal/dry skin
The closest shade to Yepoda The Dewy Day 8W (Deep · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Jung Saem Mool Essential Skin Nuder Long-Lasting Hydrating Compact Cushion Foundation in 43N Deep, against Yepoda The Dewy Day in 8W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade8WClosest shade match43N DeepHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%92#7f5f49#846045Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 1.1
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared86
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared80
Longevity30%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall33
Skin type100%33Normal, dry, sensitiveDryBoth marketed for dry skin
Overall match 82/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Glossier Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage in Medium Deep 1, against Yepoda The Dewy Day in 8W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade8WClosest overall alternativeMedium Deep 1How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%69#7f5f49#7a5335Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%85DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 5.9
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall33
Skin type100%33Normal, dry, sensitiveSensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 83/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$5 less (13%)
Ulta Beauty
