BeyondBlur Skin Perfecting Foundation TN1 dupes and alternatives Youngblood
4.9 (60)·Medium · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: tan with warm golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium-tan cool skin with rosy undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: Medium to Dark, neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Medium Tan with neutral olive undertones
$22Ulta Beauty(product price)$36 less (62%)3.5 (42)
Matches: Very close colour
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/normal/combination/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
38
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
80
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Light rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
57
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim 16-hour wear· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/normal/combination/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim 16-hour wear· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/normal/combination/oily skin
The closest shade to Youngblood BeyondBlur Skin Perfecting Foundation TN1 (Medium · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium Coverage Foundation in 9 Neutral, against Youngblood BeyondBlur Skin Perfecting Foundation in TN1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTN1Closest match9 NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#c5996c#c8996cLooks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 0.4
Retailer descriptionTanTanBoth described as tanThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 88/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.