BeyondBlur Skin Perfecting Foundation TW4 dupes and alternatives Youngblood
4.9 (60)·Tan · Olive · warm olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same full coverage· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
75
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/combination skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for dry/normal/combination/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Adds SPF 15
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/normal/combination/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/normal/combination/oily skin
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$44.01 less (76%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 29% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim
Matches: Very close colour· Claims not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Light rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
49
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim
Retailer shade note: rich tan w/warm peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Warm rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Warm rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim
$49Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (16%)4.2 (355)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim 12-hour wear· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural matte finish· Light rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
30
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
The closest shade to Youngblood BeyondBlur Skin Perfecting Foundation TW4 (Tan · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Fenty Beauty Soft'Lit Naturally Luminous Hydrating Longwear Foundation in 330, against Youngblood BeyondBlur Skin Perfecting Foundation in TW4. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTW4Closest shade match330How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%97#ba804e#ba824fLooks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99TanMedium tanCloseDepth difference: 0.7
Retailer descriptionRich deepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 79/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
BLK/OPL TRUE COLOR Skin Perfecting Stick Foundation SPF 15 in Truly Topaz, against Youngblood BeyondBlur Skin Perfecting Foundation in TW4. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTW4Closest overall alternativeTruly TopazHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%91#ba804e#b98056Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.0
Retailer descriptionRich deepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 86/100Shade match 87/100Low confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$19 less (33%)
