Make Me Blush 24H Buildable Powder Blush 6 Rose Haze dupes and alternatives Yves Saint Laurent
4.8 (2,863)·Pink · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
36
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
49
Very close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Normal rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Lighter· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: peachy pink with golden shimmer
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
36
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Deeper· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
36
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Peach rather than pink· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than pink · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: soft peach (swish and pop glow)
Differences: Apricot rather than pink· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
69
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Apricot rather than pink · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
$36Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (22%)4.3 (1,914)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Lighter· Satin rather than matte (finish)· 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
26
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Satin rather than matte (finish) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Benefit Cosmetics Silky-Soft Powder Blush in Dandelion, against Yves Saint Laurent Make Me Blush 24H Buildable Powder Blush in 6 Rose Haze. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade6 Rose HazeClosest shade matchDandelionHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour55%95#f0a096#f0a49cLooks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall84
Finish50%67MatteSatinSome differenceSatin finish rather than matte
Overall match 85/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush in Baby Girl, against Yves Saint Laurent Make Me Blush 24H Buildable Powder Blush in 6 Rose Haze. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade6 Rose HazeClosest overall alternativeBaby GirlHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour55%87#f0a096#efa8a2Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 2.8 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 87/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.