Make Me Blush 24H Buildable Powder Blush 93 Restless Rose dupes and alternatives Yves Saint Laurent
4.8 (2,863)·Pink · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
57
Comfort & skin suitability
69
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Matte rather than satin (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than satin (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
69
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
49
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Normal rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
69
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Lighter· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: peachy pink with golden shimmer
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: satin· Same format: powder
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: mini matte peachy pink (no shimmer)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: powder· Claims comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
36
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
36
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Ulta Beauty Collection Too Cheeky Lip & Cheek Color Stick in Social, against Yves Saint Laurent Make Me Blush 24H Buildable Powder Blush in 93 Restless Rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade93 Restless RoseClosest shade matchSocialHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour55%98#f09fa5#f0a0a8Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60WarmNeutralSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall54
Finish50%58SatinShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than satin
Pigmentation25%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format25%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4024-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared69
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 74/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Benefit Cosmetics Silky-Soft Powder Blush in Dandelion, against Yves Saint Laurent Make Me Blush 24H Buildable Powder Blush in 93 Restless Rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade93 Restless RoseClosest overall alternativeDandelionHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour55%69#f09fa5#f0a49cSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 81/100Shade match 83/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.