Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims comfort
Differences: Coral rather than red· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than red · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$11Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (71%)4.5 (32,188)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Berry rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
69
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
$11Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (71%)4.5 (32,188)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
69
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims waterproof
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims comfort
Differences: Lighter· Mauve rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Mauve rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims comfort
Differences: Coral rather than red· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than red · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matched on the deeper blush pan, against the blush pan of your shade
69
overall
Shade match79
$42SephoraCosts $4 more4.7 (1,833)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: cream· Claims comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than red· Dewy rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than red · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
MERIT Flush Balm Cream Blush in Rouge, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Magic Touch Cream Blush & Lip Trio in Berry/Rose. Compared using the blush pan of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBerry/RoseClosest shade matchRougeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour55%86#cb464e#c15057Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall68
Finish50%78MatteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than matte
Pigmentation25%30OpaqueSheerDifferentSheer rather than opaque
Format25%85CreamStickCloseStick rather than cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 77/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Yves Saint Laurent Make Me Blush 12H Blurring Liquid Blush in 3 Mischievous Magenta, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Magic Touch Cream Blush & Lip Trio in Berry/Rose. Compared using the blush pan of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBerry/RoseClosest overall alternative3 Mischievous MagentaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour55%82#c54876#cc5277Close colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92MediumMediumSameDepth difference 4.0 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Combination, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.