Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: cream· Claims comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Claims comfort
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
69
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims comfort
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Yves Saint Laurent Make Me Blush 12H Blurring Liquid Blush in 66 Fuchsia Fling, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Magic Touch Cream Blush & Lip Trio in Pink. Compared using the blush pan of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePinkClosest match66 Fuchsia FlingHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour55%98#ed83a7#e984a8Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Combination, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.