Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
69
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims comfort
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Very close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
69
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: cream· Claims comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Mauve rather than pink· Dewy rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
$34Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (11%)4.8 (818)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims comfort
Differences: Berry rather than mauve· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than mauve · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
MAC Cosmetics Glow Play Cushiony Blush in Heat Index, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Magic Touch Cream Blush & Lip Trio in Peach. Compared using the blush pan of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePeachClosest matchHeat IndexHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour55%90#d5606a#df5768Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 81/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$28.01 less (74%)
