Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip gloss overall: shade match 50%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 10%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same shine: high shine· Both claim non-sticky
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Peach rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · High shine
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Peach rather than nude · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same shine: high shine· Both claim non-sticky· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · High shine · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than nude · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same shine: high shine· Both claim non-sticky
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Warm rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · High shine
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Peach rather than nude · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same shine: high shine· Both claim non-sticky· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Warm rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · High shine · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than nude · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
MAC Cosmetics Lipglass Air Non-Sticky Lipgloss in Accolade, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Universal Luminous Tinted Lip Gloss in Butterscotch. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeButterscotchClosest matchAccoladeHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall84
Colour55%82#b76d3f#b56e4cClose colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Transparency35%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a transparency
Shimmer25%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists shimmer
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity100%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability10% of overall70
Non-sticky50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a non-sticky feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 80/100Shade match 84/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $17 more
