Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip gloss overall: shade match 50%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 10%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same shine: high shine
Differences: Pink rather than peach· Glitter rather than sparkle (shimmer)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · High shine
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than peach · Glitter rather than sparkle (shimmer) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim non-sticky
Clarins Lip Perfector Peptide-Plumping Lip Gloss in 02 Apricot Shimmer, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Universal Luminous Tinted Lip Gloss in Peachy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePeachyClosest shade match02 Apricot ShimmerHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall87
Colour55%81#ed9a81#f5a78aClose colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%86LightLightSameDepth difference 5.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PeachPeachSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared77
Shine40%78High shineShimmerCloseLess shine
Transparency35%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a transparency
Shimmer25%75SparkleShimmerSome differenceShimmer rather than sparkle
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity100%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability10% of overall70
Non-sticky50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a non-sticky feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 76/100Shade match 87/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Summer Fridays Dream Lip Oil for Moisturizing Sheer Coverage in Bare Sand, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Universal Luminous Tinted Lip Gloss in Peachy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePeachyClosest overall alternativeBare SandHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall80
Colour55%86#ed9a81#ee9887Very close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60WarmNeutralSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Transparency35%—not comparableNot listedTintedNot listed for eitherA transparency not listed for one product
Shimmer25%—not comparableSparkleNot listedNot listed for eitherShimmer not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall100
Longevity100%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Comfort & suitability10% of overall70
Non-sticky50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a non-sticky feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 87/100Shade match 80/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $3 more
