Universal Luminous Tinted Lip Gloss Toffee Rose dupes and alternatives Anastasia Beverly Hills
4.4 (2,741)·Brown · Neutral · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip gloss overall: shade match 50%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 10%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same shine: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim non-sticky
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Warm rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Nude rather than brown · Shimmer rather than sparkle (shimmer)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Nude rather than brown· Shimmer rather than sparkle (shimmer)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Nude rather than brown · Shimmer rather than sparkle (shimmer) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim non-sticky
Retailer shade note: sheer maple nude with shimmer
Matches: Same shine: shimmer· Both claim non-sticky
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Nude rather than brown · Shimmer rather than sparkle (shimmer) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same shine: shimmer· Same shimmer: sparkle· Both claim non-sticky
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Nude rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Nude rather than brown · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Nude rather than brown· Shimmer rather than sparkle (shimmer)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Nude rather than brown · Shimmer rather than sparkle (shimmer) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim non-sticky
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Nude rather than brown· Shimmer rather than sparkle (shimmer)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Nude rather than brown · Shimmer rather than sparkle (shimmer) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim non-sticky
Pat McGrath Labs Lust: Gloss in Bronze Venus, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Universal Luminous Tinted Lip Gloss in Toffee Rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeToffee RoseClosest shade matchBronze VenusHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall90
Colour55%93#e47e6a#dc816fVery close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared90
Shine40%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shine level
Transparency35%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a transparency
Shimmer25%75SparklePearlSome differencePearl rather than sparkle
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity100%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability10% of overall70
Non-sticky50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a non-sticky feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 81/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Refy Lip Gloss with Hyaluronic Acid in Taupe, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Universal Luminous Tinted Lip Gloss in Toffee Rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeToffee RoseClosest overall alternativeTaupeHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall90
Colour55%93#e47e6a#dd7c65Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 2.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralCoolSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared78
Shine40%78ShimmerHigh shineCloseMore shine
Transparency35%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a transparency
Shimmer25%—not comparableSparkleNot listedNot listed for eitherShimmer not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall100
Longevity100%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Comfort & suitability10% of overall40
Non-sticky50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a non-sticky feel; the match does not list it
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 83/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $15 more
