Matte Beauty Blush Wand Pillow Talk dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.2 (844)·Pink · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
44
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format)
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Anastasia Beverly Hills Cream Stick Blush with Brush Applicator in Bubble Gum, against Charlotte Tilbury Matte Beauty Blush Wand in Pillow Talk. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePillow TalkClosest shade matchBubble GumHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour55%90#cc686d#c26b6bVery close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumLightCloseDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall40
Finish50%25MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%45LiquidStickSome differenceStick rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared78
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Overall match 78/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Powder Kiss Liquid Lip & Cheek Mousse in Mull it Over, against Charlotte Tilbury Matte Beauty Blush Wand in Pillow Talk. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePillow TalkClosest overall alternativeMull it OverHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour55%72#cc686d#cc615bClose colourColour difference 4.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall91
Finish50%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%100LiquidLiquidSameBoth liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared70
Longevity50%70Long-wearing10-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 10-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 83/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.