Matte Beauty Blush Wand Pillow Talk Pink Pop dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.2 (844)·Pink · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims waterproof
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
34
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Balm rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Balm rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Peach rather than pink· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
44
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than pink · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format)
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
46
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Milk Makeup Cooling Water Jelly Tint Lip + Cheek Blush Stain in Phreeze, against Charlotte Tilbury Matte Beauty Blush Wand in Pillow Talk Pink Pop. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePillow Talk Pink PopClosest matchPhreezeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour55%92#ff998d#fea195Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared83
Finish50%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%100LiquidStainCloseBoth liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 90/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$4 less (9%)
Ulta Beauty
