Matte Beauty Blush Wand Pillow Talk Peach Pop dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.2 (844)·Peach · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Coral rather than peach· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
44
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than peach · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Balm rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Balm rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown / nude rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown / nude rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
46
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Kosas Blush is Life Baked Talc-Free Dimensional + Brightening Blush in Wavelength, against Charlotte Tilbury Matte Beauty Blush Wand in Pillow Talk Peach Pop. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePillow Talk Peach PopClosest shade matchWavelengthHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%94#f28972#fb8a73Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 2.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PeachPeachSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall44
Finish50%45MatteDewySome differenceDewy finish rather than matte
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Combination, OilyNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 96/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Jane Iredale PurePressed Blush in Velvet Petal, against Charlotte Tilbury Matte Beauty Blush Wand in Pillow Talk Peach Pop. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePillow Talk Peach PopClosest overall alternativeVelvet PetalHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour55%88#f28972#e88d7bVery close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PeachPeachSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall71
Finish50%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 93/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.